The High Court has dealt a fresh blow to a group of former advisers attached to President William Ruto after rejecting their request to remain in office temporarily.
The officials had moved to court seeking a six-month extension following an earlier ruling that declared their advisory positions unconstitutional and legally invalid.
They argued that the additional time was necessary to ensure a smooth transition and complete pending administrative duties.
However, the court dismissed the application, terming it legally unfounded. In its ruling, the judge stated that once positions are declared unconstitutional, there is no legal basis for allowing their holders to continue serving, even on a temporary basis.
The court further explained that administrative convenience cannot override constitutional requirements.
According to the ruling, the decision declaring the roles null and void took effect immediately, leaving no room for a transition period.
The judgment underscores the limits of executive appointments and reinforces the judiciary’s role in safeguarding the Constitution. It also makes clear that all public offices, regardless of proximity to power, are subject to constitutional scrutiny.
Tags
News