Political activist Morara Kebaso has launched a sharp critique of Kenya’s economic direction, accusing successive governments of surrendering control over key policies on industrialisation and job creation to external lenders.
In a series of posts on X, Kebaso claimed that Kenya has “never drafted its own policy on industrialisation or job creation,” arguing that major economic decisions are often influenced by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as conditions attached to loan agreements.
He alleged that policies such as privatisation, high fuel taxes, currency devaluation, and cuts to social protection programmes are shaped externally rather than being domestically conceived.
According to Kebaso, this has left Kenya unable to develop homegrown solutions that could benefit its citizens directly.
Kebaso also highlighted the country’s rising debt burden, claiming that up to 70 per cent of government revenue is directed towards debt repayment. He said this leaves limited resources for investment in productive sectors that could create jobs and boost local manufacturing.
The activist did not spare political leaders from criticism. He accused them of facilitating the situation through corruption and self-interest. He further claimed that ethnic-based political loyalty has allowed unpopular economic policies to persist without sufficient public accountability.
His remarks come amid growing public debate over Kenya’s economic trajectory, rising cost of living, and the government’s engagement with international financial institutions.
The IMF has previously defended its role, stating that its programmes are negotiated with national authorities and aim to stabilise the economy, manage debt, and support growth.
Kebaso’s comments add to mounting calls from activists and civil society groups for a more locally driven economic model, one that focuses on industrial growth, job creation, and social protection for ordinary Kenyans.
Tags
News